<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows WHAT?!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twoslashes.com/2008/05/13/windows-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twoslashes.com/2008/05/13/windows-what/</link>
	<description>remarking on every line of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19854</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.twoslashes.com/2008/05/13/windows-what/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 06:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twoslashes.com/?p=124#comment-70</guid>
		<description>If they&#039;re still aiming for money as much as I&#039;d believe they are, they&#039;d never ditch a market they still have an overwhelming market share in.  Even if it means pushing out more crap they get bad reviews too.  As long as it&#039;s profitable, they&#039;ll do it.

And I don&#039;t see Apple picking up too many of the pieces if MS does manage to drop the ball.  I&#039;m sorry, but I just don&#039;t see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#8217;re still aiming for money as much as I&#8217;d believe they are, they&#8217;d never ditch a market they still have an overwhelming market share in.  Even if it means pushing out more crap they get bad reviews too.  As long as it&#8217;s profitable, they&#8217;ll do it.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t see Apple picking up too many of the pieces if MS does manage to drop the ball.  I&#8217;m sorry, but I just don&#8217;t see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.twoslashes.com/2008/05/13/windows-what/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twoslashes.com/?p=124#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Basically you&#039;ve got one of two possibilities with this video. 1) It really is from Microsoft and they&#039;re &quot;showing off&quot; new features. 2) It&#039;s someone&#039;s &quot;wish list&quot; for Win7. Either way Microsoft looses.

If it&#039;s a Microsoft video, well, they&#039;re just showing off that their coders can copy and paste and eliminate copyright. If it&#039;s someone&#039;s wish list then it shows how bad the Windows operating environment has gotten. If I was going to dream big for Windows, it wouldn&#039;t be FTP bloatware.

I&#039;ve read &quot;reports&quot; that post Windows 7 Microsoft will no longer focus on their operating systems and focus on their software offerings. I doubt that&#039;s true, but if Windows 7 is anything like Vista, they might not have a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically you&#8217;ve got one of two possibilities with this video. 1) It really is from Microsoft and they&#8217;re &#8220;showing off&#8221; new features. 2) It&#8217;s someone&#8217;s &#8220;wish list&#8221; for Win7. Either way Microsoft looses.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s a Microsoft video, well, they&#8217;re just showing off that their coders can copy and paste and eliminate copyright. If it&#8217;s someone&#8217;s wish list then it shows how bad the Windows operating environment has gotten. If I was going to dream big for Windows, it wouldn&#8217;t be FTP bloatware.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read &#8220;reports&#8221; that post Windows 7 Microsoft will no longer focus on their operating systems and focus on their software offerings. I doubt that&#8217;s true, but if Windows 7 is anything like Vista, they might not have a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

