Too ‘Cuil’ To Be Accurate, Too Hot To Survive Digg
by Nick on Jul.28, 2008, under Musings
(That’s ‘cuil’ pronounced cool…bah, you’ll read why in a second, so screw the explanation.)
It’s no mistake that I’ve been a longtime fan of Google…well, everything. Just about all of my e-mail is handled through them (including through Apps for Domains), I pay $20 a year for extra space on Picasa because I find it so much more usable than Flickr, and I’ve at least tried just about every other service they’ve offered. I’m also the person who needs to try “the next big thing” much in the same way I have with Twitter and a whole dictionary of other sites that I’ve tried, put to use, retired, or whatever.
With all the buzz surrounding Cuil, I decided to divert my first few searches of the day (and a few vanity/test queries for comparison) to them to see how much more benefiting the results they deliver were to me. And sadly, Cuil is about as “cuil” (it’s pronounced cool, if you missed that aside) as a sackful of cucumbers in this warmish Chicago summer. In other words, their current setup renders it useless for me. (Screenshots have been used throughout this post because at the time of writing, Cuil was bouncing in and out of service.)
Taking a look at their homepage, it’s no doubt that there’s a touch of Google in the air. It’s simple, with only a few links to their policy and about pages, and the text box. (Wait a minute…that sounds oddly like a page I see every hour.) In fact, I think the only differences I can point out between the two are the off-center alignment, the color scheme, and the logos. Hardly anything unexpected. But looks don’t change how it works, so I might as well explain what I think of it after using it for a few minutes.
Being one of the founding members of TechCentric, it’s obviously no surprise that I would compare our rank on Cuil with how we’re doing everywhere else (which isn’t too hot given our hiatus, but that’s another story). On Google and Yahoo, for example, TechCentric ranks right on top as the first result, while we place third on MSN (behind our own Wikipedia entry, for crying out loud). With Cuil, there’s no “ranking” so much as there is a menagerie of results thrown at you in a somewhat-cool, somewhat-overloading multicolumn layout, with what I assume are supposed to be related images thrown in. Picture a random page from the classifieds, replace all the advertisements with the typical excerpt from that result, and dot in a few random graphics for spice. That’s the idea I get from Cuil’s results page.
Now, when I say they add random pictures, I pretty much mean it. Aside from similar occurances noted by my friends, one of the images suggested by Cuil for my TechCentric search was that thumbnail of the three girls right there next to the link to the Crew listings. I’ve included myself, Steve, and Will next to the image for comparison, but I don’t think any of those (four if you count the half-head to the right) girls look a thing like us, and they don’t appear anywhere on the TechCentric site. I do believe they’re trying to suggest I’m something I’m not (namely, female). They also seem to believe we’re related to The Who, as they have a poster thumbnail next to the suggested result on Wikipedia.
While the lack of relevance towards TechCentric could have been because of our lack of production, I found it quite awkward that searching for ‘justincox’ (you should know him by now) turned up only his Twitter account and some stuff which he claims isn’t him. And not a sign of his site in sight on the first page of the results, either. At least Rachelskirts can’t complain about her placement. Searching for myself by name was a complete bust, as it turned up more results from other users’ Twitter pages than it did anything remotely relevant to me. (Though there are a few underlaying things I noticed that I’m not willing to discuss just yet.) Searching for ‘two slashes’ was also an exercise in patience, though removing the space found this site instantly (along with another random image alongside the TechCentric crew page).
One idea I liked, though it wasn’t exactly useful to me in its current state, was the category box on the right side, which suggests people and things relevant to what you might be searching for. TechCentric comes up with some IPTV-related stuff, as it should, and some of my other searches were categorized correctly, but the suggested additions to your query might not be as helpful. For example, searching for Darren Kitchen (from Hak.5) offered the expected categories for podcasting and vidcasts, but some of the suggested keywords (like Leo Laporte) just turned what could have been a helpful search into a useless waste of Intertubes, combined by the fact that they’re mashed with your original query. (I think I finally stopped myself after ‘Darren Kitchen Leo Laporte Patrick Norton FLOSS Weekly‘ turned up as much whitespace as it did content.)
Cuil also seems to be having a problem with staying usable at the moment, partially thanks to repeated waves of news flooding Twitter, and its placement on Digg’s front page at the moment. Considering Google’s tried-and-true methods and the fact that they handle plenty more traffic in any given hour than Cuil will probably see in the next day or two, perhaps the Google-alum masterminds behind the site could have brought a little more to the table in terms of reliability. (Though I guess a similar suggestion could be made to Twitter about now. Failwhale anyone?)
The concept of a competitor to Google with the brains to suggest relevant content is hard to believe, considering Google does a decent job of filtering out the garbage already (in my experience), and it’s even easier to limit the junk when you search for something with at least a respectable idea of what you’re aiming for. But as long as the results turn up to be this jumbled and unrelated, I see no reason to deviate from my zealous (over)use of Google.
July 28th, 2008 on 5:11 pm
I have to say, I do like the look of Cuil. It’s a fresh take on web search and after years of putting up with Google’s detestable color scheme something new is welcome. That said, they’ve got a long way to go in bringing up relevant search results before it’s actually worth using.
July 30th, 2008 on 7:15 pm
Actually, I do have one complaint to register about my placement… My own website comes in after my Twitter account, and there are like ten stories from Pownce within the first few pages. I don’t even USE Pownce anymore! Sure, I dominate all the results for a search on Rachelskirts, but that’s because nobody else has tried to use that nickname. (Trust me, I loathe the day when that is no longer the case.) Also, the fact that Google can generate 10,000 results for the same search (compared to a measly 2,000+) is further proof that Cuil is clearly in its infancy and has a long way to go before they can even think about being “cool” enough to ask for Google’s autograph.
So maybe that was more than one complaint, or maybe you’ll let me get away with lumping that together as one giant complaint. Either way, nice review. I’m also a complete sell-out for Google, but I am interested in seeing how Cuil grows and adapts.
July 31st, 2008 on 12:28 am
Justin: I like the look of Cuil too. I don’t find Google’s design to bother me all that much, but to each his own.
Rachelskirts: Heap your complaints into one or break them into tiny pieces; you can count them the way you want.
Regarding the name issue, that’s a pretty good observation to make, and one I didn’t think of before. While my name isn’t exactly the most common, three hundred results for Justin’s name in the white pages (and just for the United States, so foreign or unlisted numbers aren’t counted) means there’s going to be a problem weeding through for the ones related to that Justin.