<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Two Slashes &#187; Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twoslashes.com/tag/google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twoslashes.com</link>
	<description>remarking on every line of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
<cloud domain='www.twoslashes.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
			<item>
		<title>Peeing in the Wave Pool</title>
		<link>http://www.twoslashes.com/2009/10/01/peeing-in-the-wave-pool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.twoslashes.com/2009/10/01/peeing-in-the-wave-pool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twoslashes.com/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#8217;t take a meteorologist to predict the tsunami that a preview of Google&#8217;s new Wave platform would cause.  I can&#8217;t click one link without seeing three different remarks referencing the hot new app, though I can&#8217;t seem to understand why people are so excited about it. In case you&#8217;ve got a bad memory or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://albums.kimag.es/albums/nicktabick/86720536.png" alt="" width="217" height="147" />It doesn&#8217;t take a meteorologist to predict the tsunami that a preview of Google&#8217;s new <a href="http://wave.google.com">Wave platform</a> would cause.  I can&#8217;t click one link without seeing three different remarks referencing the hot new app, though I can&#8217;t seem to understand why people are so excited about it.</p>
<p>In case you&#8217;ve got a bad memory or hearing loss, I&#8217;ll quickly give an overview of Wave to save the sanity of my remaining readers before delving into just what about the platform I don&#8217;t like.  For the uninitiated, Wave is a platform Google announced this summer that combines document editing, an e-mail-like environment, live collaborative capabilities, and enhancements provided by &#8220;robots&#8221; (as opposed to the generally used &#8220;bot&#8221;) into a single unified experience.  Everything is done in real-time, so modifications you&#8217;re in the middle of can be observed by anyone else in that particular thread (referred to as a wave).  It&#8217;s an open platform, so anybody can write a &#8220;robot&#8221; or extend the API, but so far I haven&#8217;t seen anything remotely productive beyond <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/05/28/twave/">a Twitter bot</a> or various games.  (Maybe I&#8217;m just ignorant.)</p>
<p>Along with Google&#8217;s original announcement, they offered developers early access as they tweaked a few things so that when preview time came about (now, in other words), there would be plenty of examples and enough bragging rights to go around.  It was also a great way to acquaint people with an enhanced interest in the product (like myself), and I was one of the lucky people selected to get in on the sandbox.</p>
<p>I never developed anything for Wave, let alone used it for anything productive, but I did spend a few minutes chatting with a few friends who also found themselves with sandbox access and a little too much boredom in their lives.  I also watched as several people immediately decided to turn their sights towards robots geared to spam ads and utter nonsense (including one bugger that kept embedding YouTube videos of Rick Astley&#8217;s hit song&#8230;yeah, that one).  All the same, with just a handful of friends and a low signal-to-noise ratio, I really didn&#8217;t see a point in regularly checking the site.</p>
<p>When Google finally announced their semi-public preview (read:  <a href="http://twitter.com/nicktabick/status/4535083479">everybody sends invitations everywhere</a>), I was unsure of whether I even wanted to bother with it.  It&#8217;s not to say that I don&#8217;t like Google (I have several domains running Google Apps, a few Gmail accounts, a Google Voice account or three, and some extra paid storage to boot), but the nasty taste from the developer&#8217;s preview combined with the fact that I didn&#8217;t think too many friends would bother with it left me undecided but leaning towards not bothering to move my account into the preview.</p>
<p><a href="http://albums.kimag.es/albums/nicktabick/12213159.png"><img class="alignleft" src="http://albums.kimag.es/albums/nicktabick/12213159.png" alt="" width="368" height="155" /></a>It goes without saying that I got bored and ported the account anyway, and I&#8217;ve asked myself why I bothered ever since.</p>
<p>The way I see it, Wave is something of a novelty at this point in time and in its current state.  It&#8217;s not useful to anybody (at least, anybody I know), and <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/google-wave-features/">it doesn&#8217;t do anything I find worthwhile</a> that I can&#8217;t already implement or find support for, either in another Google app (think <a href="http://docs.google.com">Docs</a> and <a href="http://mail.google.com">Gmail</a> in particular) or <a href="http://etherpad.com/">elsewhere</a>.  And the fact that it isn&#8217;t integrated with Gmail is a disappointment, as I feel that they could have turned Gmail into a legitimate killer app by adding Wave as a Gmail Labs option (which keeps the opt-in approach for people who decide they want to &#8220;catch the Wave&#8221;).</p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;m wondering why Google didn&#8217;t opt for the b@$*@&amp;d-child approach in the first place, because as-is Gmail just isn&#8217;t the innovative utility it was when it first launched.  Yahoo! offers more space (namely, as much as you want <strong>for free</strong>), and there&#8217;s really nothing of note at this point that the Google/Gmail experience offers that can&#8217;t be found elsewhere.  Being a plugin for a service that a good number of people use, though, offers a much wider userbase and might pull in some people who otherwise might not even be aware of Wave&#8217;s existence.  Google&#8217;s always touted Gmail as the &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; e-mail platform, but there&#8217;s nothing revolutionary about being second fiddle overall.  (A free Exchange server?  Seriously, this is the best they can offer?)</p>
<p>And, rather than forcing the user to keep two tabs or windows open so they can monitor both their incoming messages and Wave updates, the integration would be a step in the right direction.  (I really think they should look into developing Google Insight, the Google-powered, web-based alternative to Outlook with one-click access to everything.  Outlook&#8230;Insight&#8230;get it?  <strong>Bah!</strong>)</p>
<p>And I know I&#8217;m not the only person thinking that Wave is really over-hyped.  I&#8217;ve talked with several friends who were excited to get their invites, only to have their hopes and dreams wipe out, and the people who start threads with me seem to abandon them after just a few minutes.</p>
<p>Like the beach, Wave is just one more thing I don&#8217;t see myself visiting regularly.  It&#8217;s not to say that I won&#8217;t try to check it (on occasion), but there&#8217;s really no compelling reason for me to do so.  If I really had a need for a collaborative environment where the features Google provides are exactly what I&#8217;m looking for, maybe I&#8217;d feel differently.  But, as of now, I can&#8217;t see this taking off until someone finds a better use for it.  I&#8217;d sooner pay for an <a href="http://www.evernote.com/">Evernote</a> <a href="http://www.evernote.com/about/premium/">subscription</a> than have to deal with any more water metaphors.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 436px"><img src="http://albums.kimag.es/albums/nicktabick/57204624.png" alt="This really sums it up." width="426" height="400" /><p class="wp-caption-text">This really sums it up.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.twoslashes.com/2009/10/01/peeing-in-the-wave-pool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
