Most recently, the question came up in a discussion on a WordPress development mailing list where contributor Paleo Pat voiced his concern for the medium as a whole after having read an older article on Wired.  (My apologies for the link sandwich there, but I figured every breadcrumb needed to be covered.)

The Wired article essentially states that blogging is dead and that people who contribute or develop them are merely wasting their time at this point:

Writing a weblog today isn’t the bright idea it was four years ago. The blogosphere, once a freshwater oasis of folksy self-expression and clever thought, has been flooded by a tsunami of paid bilge. Cut-rate journalists and underground marketing campaigns now drown out the authentic voices of amateur wordsmiths. It’s almost impossible to get noticed, except by hecklers. And why bother? The time it takes to craft sharp, witty blog prose is better spent expressing yourself on Flickr, Facebook, or Twitter.

The sheer number of platforms available (WordPress, Movable Type, hlscript (and the Justin Frankel/Cockos fork hl--), and Expression Engine, just to name a few) mean that just about anybody with a few dollars in their pocket (to pay for hosting, of course) can get set up with a blog of their own.  And if even the money is an issue, there are even services willing to take care all of the setup for free (a la WordPress, Blogger, and Vox, for starters) at the cost of some level of customization or fine-tuning.

Wired seems to complain that providing easier access and offering more choices are akin to lowering the standards required to put your story online, but I see this as enabling, not hindering.  Why shouldn’t somebody with a few intelligent things to say be able to get their voice out without having to spend three years learning to manage a webserver on the weekend?  Who decided that bloggers should have a diverse acronym dictionary of various web technologies like PHP, CGI, and FTP as mandatory requirements for putting their words online?

Also worth taking a look at are the uses of a blog compared to Facebook, Twitter, and Flickr (as suggested above).  Flickr is a social photography site, not a place to rant about the trivialities of life, which makes that a poor substitute for the real thing.  Also, not everybody is a photographer; while undoubtedly some people will find a level of self-expression and communication through posting and browsing through images, that leaves a huge gap for people to be left out.  Facebook is a social networking site to keep in touch with your peers.  While some people tend to use Facebook as an off-scale blogging platform, “notes” (as Facebook refers to them) are not the real thing, and people tend to ignore them once their friends start cloning the childish surveys that people abandoned MySpace to avoid.  (The ability to post a new note for everything in a given RSS feed is a little amusing, too.) And Twitter…well, let’s just say that this post wouldn’t fit in 140 characters, and that some things are best left elaborated upon rather than compressed to fit such a limit.

Of course there are going to be people aiming to make money from their blog, but that’s just about typical of anything these days.  If you want to make money from your car, you would convert it into a taxi, correct?  Now, look at the number of cabs and compare that with the overall number of automobiles.  It’s a small ratio, right?  I don’t see how blogging is any different.  And on a related note (also mentioned in the Wired article), you’re going to have to deal with people who start riots.  “Insult commenters” are a part of everything, although sometimes they go by different names.  Is the point of a blog to escape them?   No.  You hear about all the people who throw paint at people wearing fur clothes; their statement may be physically destructive, so be happy you’re just dealing with a sharp-tongued snake.

Is blogging dead?  Not by a long shot.  It’s just that times change, and people need to learn to adapt to the available mediums.  Blogging isn’t the expression catch-all it once was, but it still has its purposes.

What do you think?  As usual, comments are invited (encouraged, actually).  If you vote, perhaps explain why you voted the way you did?

Such is the case with an organization that had an idea of where they were going and what they wanted when they contacted me to do some work for them.  After a face-to-face with one of the higher-ups who would be making decisions, I agreed and took on the job.  I put in the work, and even took time out of my day to go to their meetings to present what I had done as progress.  I got feedback and regular communication, and overall things went along more smoothly than I could ever have hoped for; I still don’t think I’ve taken on a job that went together as easily as this one since.

Not to be leading or anything, but this was my ideal modus operandi:  Get some requests, put out what they want, get requests for improvement, implement, lather, rinse, repeat…when everything works like clockwork, everything gets done in reasonable amounts of time and nobody is left waiting for the rest of the people involved to play catch-up.

Eventually, they ran out of at-the-moment requests, and the project went live following me purchasing a few needed essentials like a relevant domain name.  At that time, all that was left was to follow a roadmap of new and additional features that were to be implemented when A) I had the chance and B) They had the content.  Well, I had plenty of chances…they just never came up with the content, and that’s where everything seemed to fall apart.

Part of the initial design requests was that everyone that might have a need to change some of the site content would have the appropriate access to it.  Therefore, my work had centered around a modified WordPress installation with a few tweaks and hacks to get what they needed.  Since at the time the site went live this was included, I would not need to routinely be posting on behalf of everyone; they could post themselves (even the computer-illiterate ones who had not ventured beyond Microsoft Word…just turn on the TinyMCE editor in WordPress and away you go, eh?) and as such I didn’t have to be bothered to modify things all the time (which in turn would require me to be around and available for communication, things I already was and still am to this day).

Now, everything seemed well and dandy, and everything seemed to have gone well.  I had done what was needed and they seemed to approve of the path I had chosen, so I ventured on to other things, leaving the immediate attention of the project in question on the back burner, checked constantly, but without interruption.  Also, at this time, my point of contact for the team had changed from the people overseeing the entire group to their communications coordinator – the guy responsible for everything from their newsletter to weekly e-mail updates.

During a routine checkup on things a short period after the project went live, I decided to spend a few seconds checking out some of the more obscure nooks and crannies making sure things were going well (and in a way being my usual self and correcting mistakes i.e. spelling and grammar…yeah, I’m paranoid like that and felt that it looked a lot more professional and to the group members’benefit if they didn’t look like a herd of buffoons).  Now, ever since the project went live, the group heads had decided that he should be the one modifying everything, and so I had had to grant him access as well (which I did…).

In the course of my poking around, I read the most recent post or two and found that this “communications” guy had not only bothered to poke around, but that he had replaced most of what was posted with links to a different site.  In short, I was pretty much providing free Google credit to this new page.  (As a quick aside, I’d just like to mention that this new site is hosted by none other than GeoCities and uses one of their templates…as laughable as it is, the new site looks like garbage and I would like nothing more than to gouge my eyes out every time I see it.)  I was nice; I simply set up a redirect so the new domain goes automatically to the other (until it expires, at which time they can buy it if they want as I have no intention of renewing); on the other hand, I could have completely smeared them (though this route would have been doubly dangerous due to an additional reason I’ll explain in a moment).

Let me run over the details one more time:

• I had run out-of-pocket to get this project online, including costs for hosting and a domain, expecting to be paid back at a later date.
• I made sure that they and their requests were of the utmost priority.  Anything they requested of me was followed through upon promptly, and I even made subtle changes to help them look more credible as things went on.
• They never repaid me for the work, and were using me as a combination manual redirect/search results enhancement.
• I never saw a cent or any other repayment other than the small accreditation I myself had appended to the footer of the WordPress template, more in hopes that people would contact me if they had problems with the site than anything else.

So, in short, it’s one more reason why my motto is “Trust is a weakness.”  It’s times like these where you feel not only stabbed in the back, but like your pocket’s been picked and you’ve been hung out to dry.

Ah well, so some people learn the hard way.  Never again will I offer to do any work without priorincentive…i.e. knowing that I’m going to get paid.  People like myself do this work not only because we enjoy it or because others don’t know, but because it pays bills, at least when people are honest and hand you what your work’s worth.  When you get ripped off like that, it’s really painful to even consider getting up and looking for work to do, since now there’s the “expectancy” that your work could just as easily have been stolen or reduced to useless overnight.

This happened a while ago, but all the same I think people can learn a few things from my story.  I’ve got a few tips below to help you out (and undoubtedly there are plenty more to pull out of that story).  I can also say that these (for the most part) apply not only to the world of web development, but to my other work as (what I like to call) “tech support.”  Anyway:

1. Don’t do anything free.  As much as some people look for a demo of what you can do, at least get reasonable assurance before you hand anything over; it’s easy enough to have one person do the design, another do the implementation, and never have to lift a finger or pay a cent.
2. Don’t go out-of-pocket unless you know you’re getting reimbursed.  The client should pay for everything, and it should be arranged in their name.  Yeah, so the domain name and hosting was a stupid move on my part.  But I say this for two reasons:  If you’re not going to get reimbursed, there’s the obvious “theft-of-service” you can accredit your client to, but there’s also the problem that you’re stuck with the (probably useless) hosting and a (most likely useless) domain.  Oh, and I could also mention the fact that if they cop out on you and switch to someone else, it’s more than easy to stake up a claim with ICANN or a similar organization to have them remove the domain from your possession and given to them…with your payment still attached.
3. Don’t do business for friends and family.  Normally, I would tell people to find someone they get that personal feeling with, but without all the chummy Christmas cards and party invitations and this and that.  I’ve violated this way too much for my own good, but I say it for a reason:  You’re going to be expected to work for free, or pretty close to it.  If you have any hope of paying the bills with your work, you’d have to rack up multiple jobs of the family/friend type as opposed to just one or two with any other client.  Not to mention, if you have to deal with these people in other manners than just business, you’re going to feel violated in their presence if they pull what the particular group from my story did.
4. Meet your clients personally, and establish a chain-of-contact before doing work.  What I’m going to say may or may not make sense, but it’s at least relevant to this case.  In short, though, get to know your client, how they act and react, and what they’re looking for so you can gauge how much work you’re going to be expected to do and for what kind of payout.  If they won’t shell out for some stupid little thing, chances are they don’t find you worth their time or money either.  I also say this because in the event of problems or complications, there’s a pre-established chain.  If there’s a change in that chain as a result of something they or you did, immediately make sure you can get to know this new contact and estimate whether it’s more worth your while to stay in the game or pull out before everything comes apart. (In my case, I didn’t do this, and it probably would have helped me realize sooner that he was going to be pulling a bag of tricks out of thin air.)

I suppose I promised an explanation for why I can’t be an ***hat and redirect the domain in my possession to something stupid or dirty; the gist of it is that I didn’t follow a few of the maxims I just stated above.  Part of the reason I got this particular assignment was because I knew the members of that leader board, and they knew I’d be able to perform to their expectations (or so they informed me).  And considering I deal with these people on a near-daily basis, I’d never hear the end of it if they went and found that something that I was held accountable for of theirs is amiss.  So again, another reason never to do business with friends and family.

I hope you can learn something from my tale, or at least use the text as filler in lieu of Lorem Ipsum.  I’ll see you in the new year with more commentary about everything.